The Trump administration has requested the U.S. Supreme Court to halt a lower court order requiring the reinstatement of three Democratic members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). President Donald Trump had dismissed Commissioners Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Saric, and Richard Trumka Jr.—all appointed by former President Joe Biden—sparking a legal battle over presidential authority.
Last month, U.S. District Judge Matthew Maddox ruled that Trump overstepped his executive powers by firing the commissioners without cause. Under U.S. law, leaders of independent federal agencies like the CPSC can only be removed for neglect of duty or malfeasance. The administration, however, argues that Trump acted within his constitutional authority and referenced a recent Supreme Court decision allowing him to remove Democratic labor board members in a similar case.
In response, the commissioners urged the justices to allow them to remain in their roles while the case is under review. They currently hold a majority on the CPSC’s five-member board. The Justice Department claims the three have opposed Trump’s regulatory agenda and their reinstatement harms the separation of powers.
The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to pause the lower court’s ruling, asserting that Congress has the right to impose limits on presidential removal powers. Judge James Wynn stated that reinstating the commissioners supports, rather than disrupts, agency operations.
The legal fight underscores ongoing tensions over executive authority and the role of independent federal agencies. The Supreme Court’s decision on whether to intervene could reshape the limits of presidential power and define how the Constitution's checks and balances apply to agency leadership.
This case adds to the series of high-profile legal disputes Trump’s administration has brought before the Supreme Court since returning to office.