The BBC is reportedly preparing legal action against AI search engine Perplexity for allegedly using its content without permission to train artificial intelligence models. According to the Financial Times, the UK public broadcaster is cracking down on tech companies scraping its digital archives, marking a broader push to protect intellectual property in the AI era.
Perplexity, backed by major investors including Jeff Bezos, has gained attention for its AI-powered search engine that generates answers from a wide array of online sources. However, the platform is now facing mounting scrutiny over how it acquires and uses copyrighted material.
The BBC joins a growing list of media organizations, including The New York Times and Axel Springer, raising concerns about unauthorized use of journalistic content to develop generative AI technologies. These companies argue that large language models, such as those powering AI tools, rely heavily on professionally produced content but often fail to credit or compensate the original publishers.
The legal pressure reflects a wider industry debate over fair use, licensing, and content monetization in the age of AI. As artificial intelligence platforms expand their capabilities, publishers are increasingly demanding transparent data practices and fair compensation structures.
Perplexity has not publicly responded to the BBC’s reported legal challenge. Meanwhile, the BBC has reaffirmed its commitment to safeguarding its intellectual property and ensuring that its journalism is not exploited without consent.
Reuters has not independently verified the Financial Times report, and no official lawsuit has been filed as of now.
This case highlights ongoing tensions between AI developers and content creators, underscoring the urgent need for legal clarity and ethical frameworks governing the use of copyrighted material in AI training.